Markus Raetz generally works with two specific (and even contradictory) points of view, the cover picture of Hofstadter's book combines even three points of view. But most 3D anamorphoses work only with one specific point of view, which reveals something that is seen only from it. Two artists, at least, have developed their work along that idea: Georges Rousse and Felice Varini. Georges Rousse (http://www.georgesrousse.com/) works mainly in buildings that are meant to be destroyed. He paints on the walls, ceilings, floors, columns, etc., in such a way that from a unique point of view a geometric shape, a word, etc., seems to have been painted on a virtual planar surface. He then takes a very accurate photography from that point of view and it is that photography which is showed to the public. Felice Varini (http://www.varini.org/) uses almost exclusively geometric shapes and he also paints on different surfaces of an existing architecture; but we can visit those spaces, so we can verify the illusion that appears at the specific point of view. I had the opportunity to see his work for the school of architecture in Nancy, and took some pictures:
créations numériques - modèles génératifs - architecture et mathématiques
digital creations - generative models - architecture and mathematics
marie-pascale corcuff
digital creations - generative models - architecture and mathematics
marie-pascale corcuff
2011-02-02
Anamorphose 3D (3)
Markus Raetz travaille en géneral sur deux points de vue spécifiques (voire contradictoires), l'image de couverture du livre de Hofstadter combine même trois points de vue. Mais la plupart des anamorphoses 3D fonctionnent avec un seul point de vue spécifique, qui révèle quelque chose qui n'est vu que de là. Deux artistes, au moins, ont développé leur oeuvre selon cette idée : Georges Rousse et Felice Varini. Georges Rousse (http://www.georgesrousse.com/) travaille essentiellement dans des bâtiments destinés à être détruits. Il peint sur les murs, les plafonds, les sols, les poteaux, etc., de façon à ce que d'un unique point de vue une figure géométrique, un mot, etc., semble avoir été peint sur une surface plane, virtuelle. Il prend alors une photographie très précise à partir de ce point de vue et c'est cette photographie qui est montrée au public. Felice Varini (http://www.varini.org/) part presque exclusivement de figures géométriques et lui aussi peint sur les différentes surfaces d'une architecture existante ; mais on peut visiter ces espaces, et donc vérifier l'illusion qui apparaît au point de vue spécifique. J'ai eu l'occasion de voir son oeuvre pour l'école d'architecture de Nancy, et j'ai pris quelques photos :
Markus Raetz generally works with two specific (and even contradictory) points of view, the cover picture of Hofstadter's book combines even three points of view. But most 3D anamorphoses work only with one specific point of view, which reveals something that is seen only from it. Two artists, at least, have developed their work along that idea: Georges Rousse and Felice Varini. Georges Rousse (http://www.georgesrousse.com/) works mainly in buildings that are meant to be destroyed. He paints on the walls, ceilings, floors, columns, etc., in such a way that from a unique point of view a geometric shape, a word, etc., seems to have been painted on a virtual planar surface. He then takes a very accurate photography from that point of view and it is that photography which is showed to the public. Felice Varini (http://www.varini.org/) uses almost exclusively geometric shapes and he also paints on different surfaces of an existing architecture; but we can visit those spaces, so we can verify the illusion that appears at the specific point of view. I had the opportunity to see his work for the school of architecture in Nancy, and took some pictures:
Markus Raetz generally works with two specific (and even contradictory) points of view, the cover picture of Hofstadter's book combines even three points of view. But most 3D anamorphoses work only with one specific point of view, which reveals something that is seen only from it. Two artists, at least, have developed their work along that idea: Georges Rousse and Felice Varini. Georges Rousse (http://www.georgesrousse.com/) works mainly in buildings that are meant to be destroyed. He paints on the walls, ceilings, floors, columns, etc., in such a way that from a unique point of view a geometric shape, a word, etc., seems to have been painted on a virtual planar surface. He then takes a very accurate photography from that point of view and it is that photography which is showed to the public. Felice Varini (http://www.varini.org/) uses almost exclusively geometric shapes and he also paints on different surfaces of an existing architecture; but we can visit those spaces, so we can verify the illusion that appears at the specific point of view. I had the opportunity to see his work for the school of architecture in Nancy, and took some pictures:
Inscription à :
Publier les commentaires (Atom)
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire